We are running this cafe for people who are curious about the working of legal system in this world. Come and join us with a cup of tea, share your ideas and thoughts in law. We believe that laws are written in our heart. It is not to be obyed, but to be lived. It makes you a little above other animals. Truly speaking, sharing the knowledge in law is a way to serve this humanity in it's pursuit to build a more awaken world.
Wednesday 20 April 2011
om: SENSE OF LAW: Criminal Procedure Code-Section 167(...
om: SENSE OF LAW: Criminal Procedure Code-Section 167(...: "SENSE OF LAW: CrimWhere the accused does not file bale application after the expiry of the prescribed period envisaged by Sec.167,the accuse..."
#comment-form
#comment-formWhere the accused does not file bale application after the expiry of the prescribed period envisaged by Sec.167,the accused cannt be released on bail under the default clause once the charge sheet is filed. In Dr.Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujrat, AIR 1996 SC 2847 (A.M.Ahmadi,Jeevan Reddy and N.P.Singh,JJ ) a Full Bench of Supreme Court observed:"....if an accused person fails to exercise his right to be released on bail for the failure of prosecution to file the charge sheet within the maximum time alloted by law, he cannot conted that he had an indefensible right to exercise it at any time notwitstanding the fact that in the mean time the charge-sheet is filed. But on the other hand if he exercises the right within the time alloted by law and is released on bail under such circumstramnces, he cannot be rearrested on the mere filing of charge-sheet, as pointed out in Aslam Bablal Desai v. State of Maharashtra, (1992)4SCC 272(A.M.Ahmadi,M.M.Punchhi and K.Ramaswamy,JJ).
Whether the accused who was entitled to be released on on bail under Sec.167(2) , not having made an application when such right had accrued, can exercise that right at a later stage of proceeding, has been examined by the Connstitution Bench of Supreme Court in Sanjay Dutt v. State Through C.B.I., Bombay (II), (1994)5 SCC 410(A.M.Ahmadi,J.S.Verma,P.B.Sawant,Jeevan Reddy and N.P.Singh,JJ). The Court held that the 'indefeasible right' in accused to be relaeased on bail under Sec.167(2) arises from the time of default and continues till filing of charge-sheet, but does not survive thereafter. After filing of charge-sheet, grant of bail would be decided on merits according to the provisions relating to grant of bailapplicable at that stage.
Latheesh kumar K.J., Advocate,Suprememe Court of India
Whether the accused who was entitled to be released on on bail under Sec.167(2) , not having made an application when such right had accrued, can exercise that right at a later stage of proceeding, has been examined by the Connstitution Bench of Supreme Court in Sanjay Dutt v. State Through C.B.I., Bombay (II), (1994)5 SCC 410(A.M.Ahmadi,J.S.Verma,P.B.Sawant,Jeevan Reddy and N.P.Singh,JJ). The Court held that the 'indefeasible right' in accused to be relaeased on bail under Sec.167(2) arises from the time of default and continues till filing of charge-sheet, but does not survive thereafter. After filing of charge-sheet, grant of bail would be decided on merits according to the provisions relating to grant of bailapplicable at that stage.
Latheesh kumar K.J., Advocate,Suprememe Court of India
Tuesday 12 April 2011
om: law andmanagement
om: law andmanagement: "manaement experts should look into the existing legal framework before making plans and policies"
law andmanagement
manaement experts should look into the existing legal framework before making plans and policies
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)